ICC: A Western Instrument, Says Expert
ICC: A Western Instrument, Says Expert
Introduction
An expert has raised concerns about the International Criminal Court (ICC), labeling it as a tool predominantly influenced by Western powers. This perspective sheds light on the ongoing debate regarding the impartiality and effectiveness of the ICC in delivering global justice.
Key Insights
Western Influence
- The ICC is perceived as being heavily influenced by Western countries, which are seen as using the court to further their geopolitical interests.
- This perception is fueled by the fact that many cases brought before the ICC involve African nations, while Western countries often escape scrutiny.
Imbalance in Prosecutions
- Critics argue that the ICC disproportionately targets leaders from developing countries, particularly in Africa.
- There is a notable absence of cases against Western leaders, raising questions about the court’s impartiality.
Calls for Reform
- Experts and critics are calling for reforms to ensure the ICC operates without bias and serves global justice equitably.
- Suggestions include diversifying the court’s leadership and ensuring a more balanced approach to case selection.
Conclusion
The ICC faces significant criticism for being perceived as a Western instrument, with calls for reform to address its perceived biases. Ensuring impartiality and equitable justice remains a critical challenge for the court as it seeks to maintain its legitimacy on the global stage.






























