Judge Dismisses Sentence Enhancements Allegedly Filed by Ex-DA Pamela Price as Retaliation

Overview

A judge has dismissed sentence enhancements that were allegedly filed by former district attorney Pamela Price as retaliation against a defense attorney. The enhancements, which could have resulted in a longer prison sentence for the defendant, were deemed invalid by the judge.

Background

• Pamela Price, who was the district attorney for Alameda County, is accused of filing the sentence enhancements in response to a defense attorney’s criticism of her handling of a case.
• The enhancements were filed in a case involving a man who was charged with assault with a deadly weapon and making criminal threats.
• The defense attorney had publicly criticized Price for not offering a plea deal in the case.

Judge’s Ruling

The judge ruled that the enhancements were filed in retaliation and were not based on any new evidence or facts in the case. The judge also stated that the enhancements were not supported by the law.

Impact

• The dismissal of the enhancements could result in a shorter sentence for the defendant.
• This ruling could also have implications for other cases where Price may have filed enhancements as retaliation.
• The judge’s decision highlights the importance of fair and impartial prosecution, without any personal vendettas or biases.

Conclusion

The dismissal of the sentence enhancements filed by former district attorney Pamela Price as retaliation serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding justice without any personal motives. This ruling could have a significant impact on the defendant’s sentence and raises questions about the conduct of Price during her time as district attorney.